A study of basis set effects on structures and electronic structures of phosphine oxide and fluorophosphine oxide
✍ Scribed by Andrew Streitwieser Jr.; Robert S. McDowell; Rainer Glaser
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1987
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 523 KB
- Volume
- 8
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0192-8651
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
A variety of basis sets have been used for geometric and electronic structure studies. Electronic effects were measured using integrated spatial electron populations (ISEP). The two largest basis sets used, 6-31G* and DZ+P, give significantly different results. Use of two d-orbital sets (6-31G*[dd]) or decontraction of the 2sp shell on phosphorus has little further effect. d-Orbitals on oxygen are required for consistent electronic structure results, and d-orbitals on fluorine have a small but significant effect. Use of diffuse functions, required for anions, is not recommended with small basis sets on neutral molecules. Large negative charges (= -1.5) on oxygen are given by all of the larger basis sets by the ISEP procedure and indicate that the PO bond in these compounds is largely semi-polar. The best simple symbolic representation of phosphine oxide is H3P'-0
, rather than H3P=0.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract A series of naphthalenediyl‐1,8‐bis(phosphine oxides) 1‐RR′P(:O)(C~10~H~6~)‐8‐P(:O)RR′ (R = R′ = Me (2a), Et (2b), iPr (2c), Cy (2d), Ph (2f) and R = tBu, R′ = Ph (2e) was prepared by oxidation of the corresponding bis(phosphines) 1a–f with molecular oxygen or H~2~O~2~·(H~2~N)~2~C(:O) a
## Abstract ChemInform is a weekly Abstracting Service, delivering concise information at a glance that was extracted from about 100 leading journals. To access a ChemInform Abstract of an article which was published elsewhere, please select a “Full Text” option. The original article is trackable v
The optimized geometries for the rotamers of propanal, 2-butanone, isobutyraldehyde, methyl isopropyl ketone, and isobutyric acid obtained using the 3-21G and 6-31G\* basis sets are compared, and systematic changes are noted. The relative 6-31G\* energies using the 3-21G and 6-31G\* geometries are g