𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A structure-based benchmark for protein–protein binding affinity

✍ Scribed by Panagiotis L. Kastritis; Iain H. Moal; Howook Hwang; Zhiping Weng; Paul A. Bates; Alexandre M. J. J. Bonvin; Joël Janin


Publisher
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
259 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
0961-8368

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

We have assembled a nonredundant set of 144 protein–protein complexes that have high‐resolution structures available for both the complexes and their unbound components, and for which dissociation constants have been measured by biophysical methods. The set is diverse in terms of the biological functions it represents, with complexes that involve G‐proteins and receptor extracellular domains, as well as antigen/antibody, enzyme/inhibitor, and enzyme/substrate complexes. It is also diverse in terms of the partners' affinity for each other, with K~d~ ranging between 10^−5^ and 10^−14^M. Nine pairs of entries represent closely related complexes that have a similar structure, but a very different affinity, each pair comprising a cognate and a noncognate assembly. The unbound structures of the component proteins being available, conformation changes can be assessed. They are significant in most of the complexes, and large movements or disorder‐to‐order transitions are frequently observed. The set may be used to benchmark biophysical models aiming to relate affinity to structure in protein–protein interactions, taking into account the reactants and the conformation changes that accompany the association reaction, instead of just the final product.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Method for computing protein binding aff
✍ Charles F. F. Karney; Jason E. Ferrara; Stephan Brunner 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 171 KB

## Abstract A Monte Carlo method is given to compute the binding affinity of a ligand to a protein. The method involves extending configuration space by a discrete variable indicating whether the ligand is bound to the protein and a special Monte Carlo move, which allows transitions between the unb

A CPU benchmark for protein crystallogra
✍ Philip E. Bourne; Wayne A. Hendrickson 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 904 KB

The CPU time required to complete a cycle of restrained least-squares refinement of a protein structure from X-ray crystallographic data usmg the FORTRAN codes PROTIN and PROLSQ are reported for 48 different processors, ranging from single-user workstations to supercomputers. Sequential, vector, VL

Search for serum protein-binding disacch
✍ Atsushi Taga; Yuka Yamamoto; Rie Maruyama; Susumu Honda 📂 Article 📅 2004 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 109 KB

## Abstract The potential use of affinity capillary electrophoresis in a microscale search for mutually interacting substances in biological fluid is demonstrated. Some disaccharides, especially gentiobiose (Gen), derivatized with 1‐phenyl‐3‐methyl‐5‐pyrazolone, caused peak retardation when electro