Jungnickel and Tonchev conjectured in [4] that if a quasi-symmetric design D is an s-fold quasi-multiple of a symmetric (v,k, A) design with (k, (sl)A) = 1, then D is a multiple. We prove this conjecture under any one of the conditions: s 5 7, k -1 is prime, or the design D is a 3-design. It is show
A short proof of a conjecture on quasi-symmetric 3-designs
β Scribed by Rajendra M. Pawale; Sharad S. Sane
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1991
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 150 KB
- Volume
- 96
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Pawale, R.M. and S.S. Sane, A short p,oof of a conjecture on quasi-symmetric 2-designs, Discrete Mathematics 96 (1991) 71-74.
It was conjettured by Sane and M.S. Shrikhande that the only nontrivial quasi-symmetric 3-design with the smaller block intersection number one is either the Witt 4-(23, 7, 1) design or its residual. Calderbank and Morton recently proved this conjecture using sophisticated number theoretic arguments. A short and elementary proof of this conjecture is presented in this paper.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
Triangle-free quasi-symmetric 2-(v, k,k) designs with intersection numbers x, y; 01, are investigated. It is proved that k β₯ 2 yx -3. As a consequence it is seen that for fixed k, there are finitely many triangle-free quasi-symmetric designs. It is also proved that: k β€ y( yx)+ x.
## Abstract A Short proof is given of the theorem that every grph that does not have __K__~4~ as a subcontraction is properly vertex 3βcolorable.
Ekhad, S.B., A short proof of a 'strange' combinatorial identity conjectured by Gosper, Discrete Mathematics 90 (1991) 319-320.
## Abstract The game domination number of a (simple, undirected) graph is defined by the following game. Two players, \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage[mathscr]{euscript}\footskip=0pc\pagestyle{empty}\begin{document}${\mathcal{A}}$\end{document} and \docume
In [ I ]I, Gandhi has stated the following conjecture on Genocchi numbl:rs: ## . z;(t~-I)~ . The meaning of the odd notation on the 1e:ft of (1) is as follows: write . . . C(k+n-1)2 ; then ## K(n+l,k)=k2K(n,k+lj-(k-l)2~(~~,k~ K(1,k)=k2-(k-1;j2 =2k--1 alId, af course, (1) is restated as (1')