The relative rate technique has been used to determine rate constants for the reaction of bromine atoms with a variety of organic compounds. Decay rates of the organic species were measured relative to z-butane or acetaldehyde or both. Using rate constants of 1.74 x and 3.5 x lo-'' cm3 rnolecule-'s-
A relative rate study of the reaction of chlorine atoms with a series of chloroalkanes at 295 K
β Scribed by Wallington, Timothy J.; Skewes, Loretta M.; Siegl, Walter O.
- Book ID
- 124093186
- Publisher
- American Chemical Society
- Year
- 1989
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 400 KB
- Volume
- 93
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-3654
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The relative rate technique has been used to measure rate constants for the reaction of chlorine atoms with nitro methane, nitro ethane, nitro propane, nitro butane, nitro pentane, ethyl nitrate, isopropyl nitrate, __n__βpropyl nitrate, 2βpentyl nitrate, and 2βheptyl nitrate. Decay rate
The rate constants for the reaction of OH radicals with a series of 1 chloroalkanes were measured at 295 K and at a total pressure of 1 atm. The rate constants were obtained by using the absolute technique of pulse radiolysis combined with kinetic UV-spectroscopy. The results are discussed in terms
Using a relative rate technique the reactions of chlorine and fluorine atoms with CF3CHO have been determined to proceed with rate constants of (1.8 % 0.4) x and (2.7 2 0.1) x lo-" cm3 molecule-' s-', respectively. Experiments were performed a t 295 ? 2 K and 700 torr total pressure of nitrogen. The
Rate constants for the gas phase reactions of hydroxyl radicals and chlorine atoms with a number of ethers have been determined at 300 2 3 K and at a total pressure of 1 atmosphere. Both OH radical and chlorine atom rate constants were determined using a relative rate technique. Values for the rate
Using relative rate techniques the reactions of chlorine and fluorine atoms with HC(O)F have been determined to proceed with rate constants of and respectively. Stated errors reflect statistical uncertainty; possible systematic uncertainties could add additional 10% and 20% ranges to the values of k