𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A prospective phase ii trial of concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy with delayed accelerated fractionation in unresectable tumors of the head and neck

✍ Scribed by Louis B. Harrison; Adam Raben; David G. Pfister; Michael Zelefsky; Elliot Strong; Jatin P. Shah; Ronald H. Spiro; Ashok Shaha; Dennis H. Kraus; Stimson P. Schantz; Elise Carper; Barbara Bodansky; Carol White; George Bosl


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
104 KB
Volume
20
Category
Article
ISSN
1043-3074

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Background. Our study is a prospective evaluation of unresectable malignant cancers of the head and neck treated with concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) using delayed accelerated fractionation (concomitant boost).

Methods: Between January 1988 and March 1995, 82 patients with unresectable cancers of the head and neck were enrolled in this phase II study. Of these, 52 patients were treated and followed for a minimum of 3 years and are the subject of this analysis. All patients had T4 lesions and were stage IV according to the American Joint Committee on Staging Criteria (AJCC). Patients received RT with accelerated fractionation to a total of 70 Gy in 6 weeks using a concomitant-boost technique. Concomitant cis platin (100 mg/M 2 ) was given on days 1 and 22 of RT. Twenty-seven patients received mitomycin-C (7.5 mg/M 2 ) on days 1 and 22, and 1 patient received mitomycin-C on day 1. In addition, 27 patients received adjuvant chemotherapy with cis platin and vinblastine. The mean follow-up was 45 months (range, 36-72 months). The minimum follow-up for surviving patients is 3 years.

Results. At 3 years, the local control rate was 58%. Threeyear local control rates for paranasal sinus, nasopharynx, oropharynx, and larynx/hypopharynx were 78%, 78%, 64%, and 100%, respectively. For all patients, the distant-metastasis-free survival was 56%, and the overall survival rate was 36%. Patients with oral cavity cancers experienced worse overall survival versus other sites, 0% versus 47% (p = .03). Salivary cancers also showed worse survival versus other sites, 0% versus 47%, but was not statistically significant. Severe acute complications occurred in 34% of patients. Treatment-related toxicity also resulted in the death of 2 patients. Severe late complications occurred in 7% of patients.

Conclusions. Treatment of this poor prognostic group of patients with aggressive chemotherapy and RT produced surprisingly good local control and survival.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Postoperative accelerated radiotherapy i
✍ Andy Trotti; Douglas Klotch; James Endicott; Marion Ridley; Alan Cantor πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 42 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: For patients treated with combination resection and postoperative radiotherapy, the interval between surgery and completion of radiotherapy represents an opportunity for tumor repopulation and treatment failure. a prospective trial to test the feasibility and efficacy of accelerated

Management of the neck in a randomized t
✍ Pierre Lavertu; David J. Adelstein; Jerrold P. Saxton; Michelle Secic; John R. W πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 94 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

Background. Treating the neck after organpreservation treatment with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy can be problematic. Methods. To develop management guidelines, we reviewed the results of a 100-patient phase-3 trial that had compared outcome after radiotherapy alone with outcome after chemorad

Alternating chemoradiotherapy versus par
✍ Renzo CorvΓ²; Marco Benasso; Giuseppe Sanguineti; Rita Lionetto; Almalina Bacigal πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 133 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

## BACKGROUND. The authors previously have found that in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN), alternating chemoradiotherapy (ALT) was superior to low-total-dose conventional radiotherapy alone. The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the

A phase II trial of cisplatin, methotrex
✍ Francesco Caponigro; Pasquale Comella; Paolo Marcolin; Francesco Russo Spena; Ma πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 89 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

## Background: Induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (scchn) might improve survival with respect to radiation therapy alone. furthermore, chemotherapy represents the only therapeutic option in metastatic head and neck carcinoma. ## Methods:

Final report of a phase II evaluation of
✍ Arlene A. Forastiere; Darleen Shank; Donna Neuberg; Samuel G. Taylor IV; Ronald πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 68 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute.