✦ LIBER ✦

A profile of male and female applicants for a special college program for learning-disabled students

✍ Scribed by Peggy T. Ackerman; M. Jeanette McGrew; Roscoe A. Dykman

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1987
Tongue: English
Weight: 826 KB
Volume: 43
Category: Article
ISSN: 0021-9762
DOI: 10.1002/1097-4679(198701)43:1<67::aid-jclp2270430109>3.0.co;2-6

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The evaluation of a special educational

The evaluation of a special educational opportunities program for disadvantaged college students

✍ Lawrence M. Aleamoni; John E. Bowers 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 741 KB

Three-year stability of WISC-R factor sc

Three-year stability of WISC-R factor scores for black and white, female and male children classified as learning-disabled

✍ Jane M. Juliano; Fredrick A. Haddad; James L. Carroll 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 545 KB

Some personality correlates of the a-b t

Some personality correlates of the a-b therapist scale for male and female medical students

✍ Jerry A. Treppa; Linda Y. Dods 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 383 KB 👁 2 views

The WISC-R as a predictor of Woodcock-Jo

The WISC-R as a predictor of Woodcock-Johnson Achievement cluster scores for learning-disabled students

✍ Jerry B. Hutton; Martha A. Davenport 📂 Article 📅 1985 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 351 KB 👁 2 views

The value of WISC-R profile analysis for

The value of WISC-R profile analysis for the differential diagnosis of learning disabled children

✍ Ronald A. Berk 📂 Article 📅 1983 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 285 KB 👁 2 views

A follow up study of a behavioral progra

A follow up study of a behavioral program for young people with learning disabilities and challenging behavior

✍ Angela Kent; Jackie Bird 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 573 KB

This paper describes a pilot follow-up study of a behavioral program for 20 young people with learning disabilities and challenging behavior. Eighteen participants made good overall improvement during the treatment period, and this was partially maintained at follow-up. Eight had continued to improv