✦ LIBER ✦

A practical approach to assessment of sampling uncertainty

✍ Scribed by Paolo de Zorzi; Maria Belli; Sabrina Barbizzi; Sandro Menegon; Andrea Deluisa

Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Year: 2002
Tongue: English
Weight: 219 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 0949-1775
DOI: 10.1007/s00769-002-0447-1

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A self-training approach to cost sensiti

A self-training approach to cost sensitive uncertainty sampling

✍ Alexander Liu; Goo Jun; Joydeep Ghosh 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 734 KB

Practical uncertainty assessment of reas

Practical uncertainty assessment of reasoning paths (fault trees) under total uncertainty ignorance

✍ M. Dohnal; J. Vykydal; M. Kvapilik; P. Bures 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 628 KB

Uncertainty from sampling: workshop to l

Uncertainty from sampling: workshop to launch a Nordtest handbook on sampling uncertainty estimation and control

✍ Jette Bjerre Hansen; Christian Grøn; Ulla Lund; Bertil Magnusson; Astrid Nordbot 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 177 KB

Assessing Framing of Uncertainties in Wa

Assessing Framing of Uncertainties in Water Management Practice

✍ Nicola Isendahl; Art Dewulf; Marcela Brugnach; Greet François; Sabine Möllenkamp 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 264 KB

A small sample confidence interval appro

A small sample confidence interval approach to assess individual bioequivalence

✍ Terry Hyslop; Francis Hsuan; Daniel J. Holder 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 104 KB

A top-down approach to calibration, vali

A top-down approach to calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification and predictive accuracy assessment

✍ Timothy Hasselman; George Lloyd 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 546 KB

This paper describes a ''top-down" uncertainty quantification (UQ) approach for calibration, validation and predictive accuracy assessment of the SNL Validation Workshop Structural Dynamics Challenge Problem. The top-down UQ approach differs from the more conventional (''bottom-up") approach in that