A top-down approach to calibration, validation, uncertainty quantification and predictive accuracy assessment
✍ Scribed by Timothy Hasselman; George Lloyd
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2008
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 546 KB
- Volume
- 197
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0045-7825
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
This paper describes a ''top-down" uncertainty quantification (UQ) approach for calibration, validation and predictive accuracy assessment of the SNL Validation Workshop Structural Dynamics Challenge Problem. The top-down UQ approach differs from the more conventional (''bottom-up") approach in that correlated statistical analysis is performed directly with the modal characteristics (frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios) rather than using the modal characteristics to derive the statistics of physical model parameters (springs, masses and viscous damping elements in the present application). In this application, a stochastic subsystem model is coupled with a deterministic subsystem model to analyze stochastic system response to stochastic forcing functions. The weak nonlinearity of the stochastic subsystem was characterized by testing it at three different input levels, low, medium and high. The calibrated subsystem models were validated with additional test data using published NASA and Air Force validation criteria. The validated subsystem models were first installed in the accreditation test bed where system response simulations involving stochastic shock-type force inputs were conducted. The validated stochastic subsystem model was then installed in the target application and simulations involving limited duration segments of stationary random vibration excitation were conducted.