A note on the relationships between some risk-adjusted performance measures
β Scribed by Donald Lien
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2002
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 100 KB
- Volume
- 22
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0270-7314
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
Assuming portfolio returns are normally distributed, it is shown that both Sortino ratio (SR) and
upside potential ratio (UPR) are monotonically increasing functions of the Sharpe ratio. As a result, all
three riskβadjusted performance measures provide identical ranking among investment alternatives. The
effects of skewness and kurtosis are then evaluated within the EdgeworthβSargan density family. For the
Sortino ratio, the above conclusion remains valid in the presence of negative skewness or excessive kurtosis.
Similar results apply to the UPR with modifications. For all other cases, both SR and UPR provide exactly opposite
ranking among investment alternatives to that suggested by the Sharpe ratio when the Sharpe ratio is large.
Applications to futures hedging are discussed. Specifically, it is found that the Sharpe ratio may frequently lead
to a smaller futures position than the other two ratios. Β© 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark
22:483β495, 2002
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract This note provides an analysis to examine the conjecture about the monotonic relationship between hedge ratio variability and hedging performance. Specific conditions are characterized to sustain the conjecture. Β© 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Jrl Fut Mark
## METHOD AND RESULTS All patients who had received both the OLT and WAIS during the inclusive period of 1960-1966 at the Durham VA Hospital were included in the study. Data relative to the patient's age, school grade achieved, OLT score and WAIS scores (Verbal I&, Performance I& and Full Scale I&
Azriel Levy ## Introduction everal authors have shown that the theoretical relationship between forward and fu-S tures prices depends primarily on the assumptions regarding the stochastic process of interest rates (Cox, et. al. (1981); Richard and Sundaresan (1981); Jarrow and Oldfield (1981); an