𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A note on the arboricity of graphs

✍ Scribed by Martin Kochol


Book ID
105541128
Publisher
Springer Japan
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
151 KB
Volume
8
Category
Article
ISSN
0911-0119

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A Note on List Arboricity
✍ P.D. Seymour πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1998 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 181 KB

We show that, for any graph or matroid, its ``arboricity'' and its ``list arboricity'' are equal. ## 1998 Academic Press A celebrated recent theorem of Galvin [2] asserts that for any bipartite graph, its chromatic index and its list-chromatic index are equal. This can be formulated as a property

On the critical point-arboricity graphs
✍ Riste Ε krekovski πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2001 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 155 KB

## Abstract In this paper, we study the critical point‐arboricity graphs. We prove two lower bounds for the number of edges of __k__‐critical point‐arboricity graphs. A theorem of Kronk is extended by proving that the point‐arboricity of a graph __G__ embedded on a surface __S__ with Euler genus __

On the linear arboricity of planar graph
✍ Wu, Jian-Liang πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 188 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

The linear arboricity la(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of linear forests that partition the edges of G. Akiyama, Exoo, and Harary conjectured for any simple graph G with maximum degree βˆ†. The conjecture has been proved to be true for graphs having βˆ† =

The linear arboricity of graphs
✍ N. Alon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1988 πŸ› The Hebrew University Magnes Press 🌐 English βš– 636 KB
The star arboricity of graphs
✍ I. Algor; N. Alon πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 714 KB
On the linear k-arboricity of cubic grap
✍ Bill Jackson; Nicholas C. Wormald πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1996 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 231 KB

Bermond et al. [2] conjectured that the edge set of a cubic graph G can be partitioned into two k-linear forests, that is to say two forests whose connected components are paths of length at most k, for all k >/5. We shall prove a weaker result that the statement is valid for all k/> 18. All graphs