The linear arboricity la(G) of a graph G is the minimum number of linear forests that partition the edges of G. Akiyama, Exoo, and Harary conjectured for any simple graph G with maximum degree ∆. The conjecture has been proved to be true for graphs having ∆ =
On the linear k-arboricity of cubic graphs
✍ Scribed by Bill Jackson; Nicholas C. Wormald
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1996
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 231 KB
- Volume
- 162
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0012-365X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Bermond et al. [2] conjectured that the edge set of a cubic graph G can be partitioned into two k-linear forests, that is to say two forests whose connected components are paths of length at most k, for all k >/5. We shall prove a weaker result that the statement is valid for all k/> 18.
All graphs considered will be finite. We shall refer to graphs which may contain loops or multiple edges as multigraphs and reserve the term graph for those which do not. A linear forest is a forest each of whose components are paths. The linear arboricity of a graph G, defined by Harary [7], is the minimum number of linear forests required to partition E(G) and is denoted by la(G). It was shown by Akiyama, Exoo and Harary [1] that la(G)=2 when G is cubic. A k-linear forest is a forest consisting of paths of length at most k. The k-linear arboricity of G, introduced by Habib and P6roche [7], is the minimum number of k-linear forests required to partition E(G), and is denoted by lag(G). It is conjectured in [-2] that if G is cubic then las(G) ~< 2. A partial result is obtained by Delamarre et al. [3], who show that lag(G) ~< 2 when k ~> F½] V(G)I-] ~> 4. The purpose of this note is to improve their result, when ] V(G)] /> 36, to:
Theorem. Let G be a cubic graph and k >~ 18 be an integer. Then lak(G) =2.
In order to prove this theorem we shall need the following lemma on matchings in multigraphs.
Lemma. Let H be a multigraph with m edges and maximum degree at most four. Let x be the number of loops in components with only one vertex, and q the number of * Corresponding author.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## Abstract The linear vertex‐arboricity ρ(__G__) of a graph __G__ is defined to be the minimum number of subsets into which the vertex set of __G__ can be partitioned such that each subset induces a linear forest. In this paper, we give the sharp upper and lower bounds for the sum and product of l
The point-linear arboricity of a graph G = (V, E), written as p,(G), is defined as p,(G) =min{k / there exists a partition of V into k subsets, V =LJt, V,, such that (V,) is a linear forest for 1 <i <k}. In this paper, we will discuss the point-linear arboricity of planar graphs and obtained follow
W e prove that the linear arboricity of every 5-regular graph is 3. That is, the edges of any 5-regular graph are covered by three linear forests. W e also determine the linear arboricity of 6-regular graphs and 8-regular graphs. These results improve the known upper bounds for the linear arboricity
## Abstract We prove in this note that the linear vertex‐arboricity of any planar graph is at most three, which confirms a conjecture due to Broere and Mynhardt, and others.
## Abstract In this paper, we study the critical point‐arboricity graphs. We prove two lower bounds for the number of edges of __k__‐critical point‐arboricity graphs. A theorem of Kronk is extended by proving that the point‐arboricity of a graph __G__ embedded on a surface __S__ with Euler genus __