The two most popular frequency response function estimators, H 1 and H 2 give biased estimates when measured input and output signals are contaminated by uncorrelated noises. Recently, an improved frequency response function estimator H s was proposed for reducing the bias error due to measurement n
✦ LIBER ✦
A note on random errors in frequency response estimators
✍ Scribed by M. Åbom
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 1986
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 284 KB
- Volume
- 107
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0022-460X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
RANDOM ERRORS FOR AN IMPROVED FREQUENCY
✍
S.-H. Jang; J.-G. Ih
📂
Article
📅
1997
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 199 KB
A note on the estimation of allele frequ
✍
Braxton M. Alfred
📂
Article
📅
1973
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 106 KB
👁 2 views
A Note on Response to Selection in Non-R
✍
Dr. T. Nomura
📂
Article
📅
1996
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 254 KB
👁 2 views
A Note on the Estimation of Coverage Err
✍
Dr. El-Sayed Nour
📂
Article
📅
1984
🏛
John Wiley and Sons
🌐
English
⚖ 413 KB
👁 3 views
Estimates of errors in the frequency res
✍
A. Bhaskar
📂
Article
📅
1995
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 591 KB
This paper examines the vibration behaviour of non-classically damped systems in the frequency domain. Errors in the frequency response incurred by neglecting off-diagonal entries of a diagonally dominant modal damping matrix are assessed. The exact response is shown to be equivalent to an infinite
Note on the prediction of random respons
✍
V.P. Rangaiah; S. Sadasivan
📂
Article
📅
1984
🏛
Elsevier Science
🌐
English
⚖ 260 KB