✦ LIBER ✦

A note on cyclic difference sets

✍ Scribed by Peter M. Neumann

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1974
Tongue: English
Weight: 93 KB
Volume: 27
Category: Article
ISSN: 0010-3640
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3160270106

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

On the difference of fuzzy sets

✍ Claudi Alsina; Enric Trillas 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 98 KB 👁 2 views

We formulate and solve a collection of functional equations arising in the framework of fuzzy logic when modeling the concept of a difference operation between couples of fuzzy sets.

A note on orthogonal sets of hypercubes

✍ Anthony B. Evans 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 105 KB 👁 1 views

Mutually orthogonal sets of hypercubes are higher dimensional generalizations of mutually orthogonal sets of Latin squares. For Latin squares, it is well known that the Cayley table of a group of order n is a Latin square, which has no orthogonal mate if n is congruent to 2 modulo 4. We will prove a

A note on cliques and independent sets

✍ Entringer, Roger C.; Goddard, Wayne; Henning, Michael A. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 58 KB 👁 1 views

For integers m, n ≥ 2, let f (m, n) be the minimum order of a graph where every vertex belongs to both a clique of cardinality m and an independent set of cardinality n. We show that f (m, n) = ( √ m -1 + √ n -1) 2 .

Another note on cliques and independent

Another note on cliques and independent sets

✍ Fred Galvin 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 50 KB 👁 1 views

A note on systems of simultaneous linear

A note on systems of simultaneous linear difference equations

✍ Koji Okuguchi 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 96 KB

A note on different Bradford multipliers

✍ Egghe, L. 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 473 KB

In this note we show that the multiplier k that appears in the law of Bradford is not the average production of articles per author nor the average number p of articles per journal, contradicting some earlier statements of Goffman and Warren and of Yablonsky. We remark however that the Bradford mult