Two methods of setting confidence intervals for test scores and testing the significance of test score differences are compared with respect to their simplicity and the similarity of their results. The conventional method, which is based on obtained scores, is unquestionably simpler than the technic
A note on a comparison of confidence interval techniques in truncated life tests
β Scribed by W. E. Coleman; T. Jayachandran; D. R. Barr
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1971
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 190 KB
- Volume
- 18
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0894-069X
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
When there are confounders in reliability studies, failing to stratify data to account for these confounding e!ects may produce a misleading estimate of the interrater agreement. In this paper, we focus discussion on interval estimation of kappa for measuring agreement between two raters with strati
The estimation of a confidence interval for attributable risk from the logistic model based on data from case-control studies is a problem for which an accepted solution is lacking. Two methods, one based on the delta method and one bootstrap on the population base, have been described but their acc
Survival data consisting of independent sets of correlated failure times may arise in many situations. For example, we may take repeated observations of the failure time of interest from each patient or observations of the failure time on siblings, or consider the failure times on littermates in tox