✦ LIBER ✦

A note of caution in interpreting the threshold of exclusion

✍ Scribed by Bernard Grofman

Book ID: 114195779
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2001
Tongue: English
Weight: 33 KB
Volume: 20
Category: Article
ISSN: 0261-3794
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3794(00)00029-9

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A note of caution when interpreting para

A note of caution when interpreting parameters of the distribution of excesses

✍ Pierre Ribereau; Philippe Naveau; Armelle Guillou 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 311 KB

Interpretation of Birth Weight Data: A N

Interpretation of Birth Weight Data: A Note of Caution

✍ Michiel F. Schreuder 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 48 KB

In Reply to ‘Interpretation of Birth Wei

In Reply to ‘Interpretation of Birth Weight Data: A Note of Caution’

✍ Maria C.P. Franco; Ricardo Sesso 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 56 KB

Caution in the interpretation of MLS

✍ Sophie Eichenbaum-Voline; Emmanuelle Génin; Marie-Claude Babron; Patricia Margar 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 38 KB 👁 2 views

We study the statistical properties of the maximum likelihood score (MLS) test. We show that the criteria for reaching conclusions about linkage are not the same for single point analysis as for multipoint, where the maximization is performed over an additional parameter, the position in the marker

Photosensitisation: A note of caution in

Photosensitisation: A note of caution in the use ofBrachiariapastures—A review

✍ R. Baber 📂 Article 📅 1989 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 376 KB

Caution in the interpretation of continu

Caution in the interpretation of continuous thrombin generation assays: a rebuttal

✍ H. C. HEMKER; E. DE SMEDT 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 140 KB