A new method for predicting binding free energy between receptor and ligand
✍ Scribed by Yoshihiro Takamatsu; Akiko Itai
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1998
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 176 KB
- Volume
- 33
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0887-3585
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
ABSRTACT
A practical method to estimate binding free energy, ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G bind , of a given ligand structure to the target receptor has been developed. The method assumes that ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G bind is given by the summation of intermolecular interaction energy, ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G inter , and partial desolvation energy, ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G desolv . ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G desolv is calculated from the buried surface area in the complex between the ligand and receptor, based on solvation energy, ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G solv , formulated by an equation which can be calibrated with observed values. Then, the method was applied to arabinose-binding protein (ABP) and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR), after recalibrating the weights for ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G inter and each term of ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G desolv using observed ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G bind data for 29 known ligands to avidin (AV). The usefulness of our method was confirmed by the fact that correlation coefficients between the calculated and observed ⌬ ⌬ ⌬ ⌬G bind' s in AV, ABP and DHFR were 0.92, 0.77, and 0.88, whereas the corresponding values obtained by simple force field calculation were 0.79, 0.30, and 0.79, respectively. Further investigations to improve the method and validate the parameters are in progress. Pro-
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
An approach using the finite difference solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation to estimate binding free energy changes for two receptor-ligand systems, arabinose binding protein and sulfate binding protein, is presented. The eight calculated binding free energy changes agree with experiment, sho
## Abstract In this study, a novel method was developed to predict the binding affinity of protein‐ligand based on a comprehensive set of structurally diverse protein‐ligand complexes (PLCs). The 1300 PLCs with binding affinity (493 complexes with __K__~d~ and 807 complexes with __K__~i~) from the
## Abstract Methyllysine histone code readers constitute a new promising group of potential drug targets. For instance, L3MBTL1, a malignant brain tumor (MBT) protein, selectively binds mono‐ and di‐methyllysine epigenetic marks (KMe, KMe~2~) that eventually results in the negative regulation of mu
found that results of similar quality are obtained by the PDLD/S method and the LRA method. This is significant since the PDLD/S method is much faster than the LRA and LIE methods. However, more studies of the relative accuracy on other systems are needed in order to establish their relative merits.