✦ LIBER ✦

A moralizing note to Professor Wolff's reply

✍ Scribed by Ervin Laszlo

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1973
Tongue: English
Weight: 85 KB
Volume: 7
Category: Article
ISSN: 0022-5363
DOI: 10.1007/bf00208798

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to professor McKelvey's note

✍ Peter Harriott 📂 Article 📅 1960 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 121 KB

The Principle of Moral Projection: A rep

The Principle of Moral Projection: A reply to Professor Ranken

✍ Kenneth E. Goodpaster 📂 Article 📅 1987 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 342 KB

Reply to Professor Wood-Jones's note: “M

Reply to Professor Wood-Jones's note: “Man and the anthropoids”

✍ William K. Gregory 📂 Article 📅 1928 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 676 KB

A note on Proving Moral Judgments: A rep

A note on Proving Moral Judgments: A reply to Mr. K. Baier

✍ Elmer D. Sprague 📂 Article 📅 1954 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 146 KB

Reply to Björnbom's note

✍ J. C. Whitwell; S. R. Dartt 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

A reply to the note of professors prigog

A reply to the note of professors prigogine and van rysselberghe

✍ J.L. Finck 📂 Article 📅 1949 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 190 KB

These two last formulas show how the affinity depends on pressure and temperature and how the affinity can be calculated. We thus see not only that dS is indeed a total differential but also that the conditions making it a total differential lead, in De Donder's method, to interesting new formulas.