✦ LIBER ✦

Reply to professor McKelvey's note

✍ Scribed by Peter Harriott

Publisher: American Institute of Chemical Engineers
Year: 1960
Tongue: English
Weight: 121 KB
Volume: 6
Category: Article
ISSN: 0001-1541
DOI: 10.1002/aic.690060439

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Reply to Professor Wood-Jones's note: “M

Reply to Professor Wood-Jones's note: “Man and the anthropoids”

✍ William K. Gregory 📂 Article 📅 1928 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 676 KB

Reply to Björnbom's note

✍ J. C. Whitwell; S. R. Dartt 📂 Article 📅 1974 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 97 KB

Reply to Professor Frézal

✍ Muenke, Maximilian 📂 Article 📅 1990 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 41 KB

Reply to Professor Schjellerup's Critici

Reply to Professor Schjellerup's Criticism of Lunar Theory

✍ John N. Stockwell 📂 Article 📅 1875 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 388 KB

Reply to Notter and Sleicher note

✍ G. A. Hughmark 📂 Article 📅 1975 🏛 American Institute of Chemical Engineers 🌐 English ⚖ 95 KB

Reply to Professor Niermeijer and Dr. Lo

Reply to Professor Niermeijer and Dr. Los

✍ ten Kate, Leo P. 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 859 B 👁 2 views

It hurts to be accused of paternalism. Nevertheless, since my intention was to stir up some discussion on the subject of disclosure of prenatally established carrier status, I welcome the reaction of Prof. Niermeijer and Dr. Los. They argue that disclosure ''will enable parents to deal with the gen