๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A method for evaluation of acidic sulfate and nitrate in precipitation

โœ Scribed by D. L. Sisterson


Book ID
104652317
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Year
1989
Tongue
English
Weight
730 KB
Volume
43
Category
Article
ISSN
0049-6979

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


A simple method is presented and used to estimate the portions of SO 2 -and NO3-that contribute to the strong acidity in weekly precipitation samples collected at three NADP sites in the eastern United States. The method assumes that, in general, the difference between SO ] -and NH 2 represents acidic sulfate and the difference between NO3-and soil-derived materials (the sum of Ca 2 +, Mg 2 +, and K รท ) represents acidic nitrate. Acidic sulfate and nitrate are considered to be the predominant source of H + (determined from laboratory pH) in the weekly precipitation samples. Most of the acidity for all three sites was attributed to acidic sulfate. The highest fraction of acidic SO 2-to H + wet deposition values was for the east-central Tennessee site (0.95) and the northeastern Illinois site (0.90), and the lowest fraction occurred at the central Pennsylvania site (0.75). The Tennessee site had the greatest acidic fraction of sulfate (0.84) and the Pennsylvania site had the greatest acidic fraction of nitrate (0.59).


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Electrophoresis of acidic glycosaminogly
โœ Erland Wessler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1971 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 177 KB

Acidic glycosaminoglycans may by divided into several groups according to the structure of their polysaccharide backbone (1). Each group is heterogeneous with respect to molecular weight and, in most cases, with respect to charge density. The charge polydispersity reflects variations in the degree o