𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A linear algorithm for the domination number of a series-parallel graph

✍ Scribed by Tohru Kikuno; Noriyoshi Yoshida; Yoshiaki Kakuda


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1983
Tongue
English
Weight
660 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0166-218X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


On the r-domination number of a graph
✍ Jerrold R. Griggs; Joan P. Hutchinson πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1992 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 468 KB

For r > 0, let the r-domination number of a graph, d,, be the size of a smallest set of vertices such that every vertex of the graph is within distance r of a vertex in that set. This paper contains proofs that every graph with a spanning tree with at least n/2 leaves has d, s n/(2r); this compares

Bounds on the -domination number of a gr
✍ Ermelinda DeLaViΓ±a; Wayne Goddard; Michael A. Henning; Ryan Pepper; Emil R. Vaug πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 200 KB

The k-domination number of a graph is the cardinality of a smallest set of vertices such that every vertex not in the set is adjacent to at least k vertices of the set. We prove two bounds on the k-domination number of a graph, inspired by two conjectures of the computer program Graffiti.pc. In part

The difference between the domination nu
✍ Xiaofan Yang; Qibin Hou; Xiangsheng Huang; Hengnong Xuan πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2003 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 325 KB

The closed neighborhood of a vertex subset S of a graph G = (V,E), denoted as N[Sj, is defined ss the union of S and the set of all the vertices adjacent to some vertex of S. A dominating set of a graph G = (V, E) is defined as a set S of vertices such that N[q = V. The domination number of a graph

A linear vizing-like relation between th
✍ Rautenbach, Dieter πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1999 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 174 KB πŸ‘ 2 views

We prove m ≀ βˆ†n -(βˆ† + 1)Ξ³ for every graph without isolated vertices of order n, size m, domination number Ξ³ and maximum degree βˆ† β‰₯ 3. This generalizes a result of Fisher et al., CU-Denver Tech Rep, 1996] who obtained the given bound for the case βˆ† = 3.