Upper bounds for u + x and ax are proved, where u is the domination number and x the chromatic number of a graph.
The difference between the domination number and the minus domination number of a cubic graph
β Scribed by Xiaofan Yang; Qibin Hou; Xiangsheng Huang; Hengnong Xuan
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science
- Year
- 2003
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 325 KB
- Volume
- 16
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0893-9659
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
The closed neighborhood of a vertex subset S of a graph G = (V,E), denoted as N[Sj, is defined ss the union of S and the set of all the vertices adjacent to some vertex of S. A dominating set of a graph G = (V, E) is defined as a set S of vertices such that N[q = V. The domination number of a graph G, denoted as y(G), is the minimum possible size of a dominating set of G. A minus dominating function on a graph G = (V, E) is a function 9 : V + {-l,O, I} such that g(N[v]) 2 1 for all vertices. The weight of a minus dominating function g is defined as s(V) = c vEV g(v). The minus domination number of a graph G, denoted ss r-(G), is the minimum possible weight of a minus dominating function on G. It is well known that r-(G) _< y(G). This paper is focused on the difference between 7(G) and y-(G) for cubic graphs. We first present a graph-theoretic description of r-(G). Based on this, we give a necessary and sufllcient condition for r(G) -7-(G) > k. Further, we present an infinite family of cubic graphs of order 18k + 16 and with -y(G) -y-(G) 2 k.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
For r > 0, let the r-domination number of a graph, d,, be the size of a smallest set of vertices such that every vertex of the graph is within distance r of a vertex in that set. This paper contains proofs that every graph with a spanning tree with at least n/2 leaves has d, s n/(2r); this compares
The k-domination number of a graph is the cardinality of a smallest set of vertices such that every vertex not in the set is adjacent to at least k vertices of the set. We prove two bounds on the k-domination number of a graph, inspired by two conjectures of the computer program Graffiti.pc. In part
We prove m β€ βn -(β + 1)Ξ³ for every graph without isolated vertices of order n, size m, domination number Ξ³ and maximum degree β β₯ 3. This generalizes a result of Fisher et al., CU-Denver Tech Rep, 1996] who obtained the given bound for the case β = 3.