𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A hypothetical explanation of saccadic oscillations

✍ Scribed by Dr. David S. Zee; David A. Robinson


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1979
Tongue
English
Weight
849 KB
Volume
5
Category
Article
ISSN
0364-5134

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Eye movements in a patient with saccadic oscillations (ocular flutter) were recorded and analyzed. Findings were related to recent microelectrode studies in the monkey pontine reticular formation which have identified three types of premotor neurons related to saccadic eye movements: burst, tonic, and pause cells. We incorporated these cell types into a hypothetical circuit that generates saccades by rapidly driving the eye to a designated orbital position rather than preprogramming a distance for movement.

Physiological measurements suggest that this neural network is unstable and that the burst neurons must be tonically inhibited to prevent saccadic oscillations during periods of fixation. Pause cells, which discharge tonically except during saccades, when they pause, appear to inhibit burst cells and prevent such saccadic oscillations. Analysis of our patient's behavior indicates that many types of saccadic oscillations can be explained and classified by assuming an abnormality of pause cell control over saccadic burst neurons.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


β€œInverse latent” macro square-wave jerks
✍ Dr. L. F. Dell'Osso; L. A. Abel; R. B. Daroff πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1977 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 580 KB

## Abstract A patient recovering from an acute encephalopathy demonstrated several ocular motor disturbances reflecting cerebellar and brainstem dysfunction. Two of these, macro square‐wave jerks and macro saccadic oscillations, have never been reported in the same patient. The macro square‐wave je

The discrepancy between in vivo and in v
✍ Peter SΓ½kora πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1984 πŸ› Elsevier Science 🌐 English βš– 466 KB

The hypothesis suggested in this paper is an attempt to explain a discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)-carcinogenesis experiments, described frequently in the literature. Whereas, in pretreated animals, a higher level of induced PAH-metabolizing enzymes red

Note of Explanation
✍ A. K. Asbury πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1989 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 81 KB