𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

The discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro experiments with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon(PAH) carcinogens: a hypothetical explanation

✍ Scribed by Peter Sýkora


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1984
Tongue
English
Weight
466 KB
Volume
110
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-5193

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The hypothesis suggested in this paper is an attempt to explain a discrepancy between in vivo and in vitro polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)-carcinogenesis experiments, described frequently in the literature. Whereas, in pretreated animals, a higher level of induced PAH-metabolizing enzymes reduces PAH-carcinogenicity, in the tissues or homogenates from pretreated animals the induced PAH-metabolizing enzymes increase the carcinogenic effects of PAH. In our model, both the pretreatment or route of administration should cause a frameshift in the alternation of active and inactive metabolites in the compartments. In pretreated animals the carginogenicity of PAH administered per os is reduced, because the PAH metabolism is completed to tetrol, the ultimate inactive metabolite, before it reaches the target tissue. The hypothesis explains the discrepancy and makes predictions which can be tested experimentally.