𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

A cross-cultural comparison of anatomy learning: Learning styles and strategies

✍ Scribed by Barry S. Mitchell; Qin Xu; Lixian Jin; Debra Patten; Ingrid Gouldsborough


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2009
Tongue
English
Weight
533 KB
Volume
2
Category
Article
ISSN
1935-9772

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

Cultural influences on anatomy teaching and learning have been investigated by application of a questionnaire to medical students in British and Chinese Medical Schools. Results from the responses from students of the two countries were analyzed. Both groups found it easier to understand anatomy in a clinical context, and in both countries, student learning was driven by assessment. Curriculum design differences may have contributed to the British view wherein students were less likely to feel time pressure and enjoyed studying anatomy more than their Chinese counterparts. Different teaching approaches resulted in British students being more likely to recite definitions to learn, and the Chinese students found learning from cross‐sectional images easy. Cultural differences may account for the observation that British students were more inclined to ask questions in class, and the preference of Chinese students to study in small groups. The findings give evidence to show how β€˜cultures of learning’ influence students' approaches and indicate the importance of cultural influences as factors amongst international and home learner groups. Anat Sci Ed 2:49–60, 2009. Β© 2009 American Association of Anatomists.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Cross-cultural issues in user learning a
✍ Dania Bilal; Imad Bachir; Nadia Caidi; Anita Komlodi; Marija Dalbello; Bharat Me πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2006 πŸ› Wiley (John Wiley & Sons) 🌐 English βš– 15 KB

## Abstract Hall (1976) believes that culture is a selective screen through which we see the world and that the basic differences in the way members from different cultures perceive reality are responsible for the mis‐communications of the most fundamental kind. Hofstede (1997) notes that cultural