๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of two time intervals for the auscultated acceleration test

โœ Scribed by Lisa L Paine; Lynn R Zanardi; Timothy R.B Johnson; Jo-Anna L Rorie; Mary K Barger


Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
2001
Tongue
English
Weight
40 KB
Volume
46
Category
Article
ISSN
1526-9523

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


ABSTRACT

Objective: Interest in an inexpensive, easyโ€toโ€administer antenatal screening test that did not rely on the use of electronic fetal monitoring led to development of the fetoscope administered auscultated acceleration test (AAT) in the late 1980s. More recent efforts have been directed toward providing those who may use the AAT with important information about the most effective and clinically appropriate AAT procedures. The purpose of this study was to determine the screening test validity performance of two AAT time intervalsโ€”6 minutes and 10 minutes.

Methods: Two auscultated acceleration tests (AAT6 and AAT10) were simultaneously performed using different time intervals on 205 women with highโ€risk pregnancies undergoing simultaneous nonstress tests (NSTS) who were referred to a tertiary care unit for antepartum testing. Standard measurements of screening test validity were calculated for each test in the prediction of selected perinatal outcomes. NST findings were included for comparative purposes.

Results: The AAT6 yielded an overall higher specificity as compared with the AAT10 at the expense of a slightly lower sensitivity for most perinatal outcomes; these differences were not significant at the .05 level. Relative risk ratios were similar for the AAT6 and AAT10 for both fetal distress and neonatal morbidity, with both AAT being a more effective predictor of neonatal morbidity than for fetal distress. Both tests yielded better sensitivity when compared with NST.

Conclusions: Even though there was a nonsignificant trend toward higher sensitivities and lower specificities for the 10โ€minute AAT, this study showed that the differences in prediction of perinatal outcomes between the 6โ€minute and 10โ€minute AAT were minimal. In view of the added labor required for the 10โ€minute AAT in the absence of enhanced screening test validity, the 6โ€minute AAT is clinically preferred. This study has prompted new research questions for the continued development of the AAT as a lowโ€technology fetal assessment technique with potential usefulness by midwives and their colleagues in a variety of settings worldwide.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Confidence intervals for test scores and
โœ Arthur B. Silverstein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 346 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

Two methods of setting confidence intervals for test scores and testing the significance of test score differences are compared with respect to their simplicity and the similarity of their results. The conventional method, which is based on obtained scores, is unquestionably simpler than the technic

Studies of alkali-silica reaction โ€” part
โœ A. Damgaard Jensen; S. Chatterji; P. Christensen; N. Thaulow; H. Gudmundsson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1982 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 405 KB

The alkali-sillca reactivity of 35 different sand types have been evaluated by both the "German" and NaCl bath methods. The results show that although there is a general correlation between the results of these two methods, the evaluations of sand by the two methods are not identical. Analyses of th