๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of two scoring systems for the memory-for-designs test

โœ Scribed by Harold Rosen

Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1971
Tongue
English
Weight
254 KB
Volume
27
Category
Article
ISSN
0021-9762

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Confidence intervals for test scores and
Confidence intervals for test scores and significance tests for test score differences: A comparison of methods
โœ Arthur B. Silverstein ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1989 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 346 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Two methods of setting confidence intervals for test scores and testing the significance of test score differences are compared with respect to their simplicity and the similarity of their results. The conventional method, which is based on obtained scores, is unquestionably simpler than the technic

Performance of retardates on the memory-
Performance of retardates on the memory-for-designs test
โœ Joan Richie; Alfred J. Butler ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1964 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 248 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

State S h l and Hospital ## PROBLEM The Memory-for-Designs Test (MFD) developed by Graham and Kendall(') involves the presentation of simple geometric designs and reproduction of these designs from immediate memory. Difficulty in performance of such a task has been assumed to be associated with "