A comparison of three models of attitude–behavior relationships in the studying behavior domain
✍ Scribed by Luigi Leone; Marco Perugini; Anna Paola Ercolani
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1999
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 264 KB
- Volume
- 29
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0046-2772
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
The theory of reasoned action (TRA;Fishbein & Ajzen, 1975), the theory of planned behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 1985) and the theory of self-regulation (TSR; Bagozzi, 1992) were applied to Italian undergraduate students' studying behavior. The main focus of the research was to ascertain the predictive power of past behavior on intention and behavior and thus test for the suciency of the theories. For theory suciency to be demonstrated, past behavior in¯uences on intention and present behavior should be totally mediated by the focal variables of the theories (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control and desire). It is argued that past behavior aects intentions and present behavior over and above attitudinal variables and that these eects will be weaker on intention for the TPB and TSR models. A structural equation approach was used to test the construct validity of measures such as the predictive validity of the theories. A total sample of 240 Italian college students participated in the research. A subsample of 90 subjects provided a self-report behavioral measure one week later. Results show that past behavior is a strong predictor of both intention and behavior in the TRA model, while it is a weaker predictor of intention in the TPB and in the TSR models. Implications for attitude± behavior relationships are discussed.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
## A labam a The presence of exhibitionism in actively exhibitionistic strippers and passively exhibitionistic models was confirmed when it was discovered that 40 out of 43 subjects produced at least one exhibitionistic (EXH) response on the Hand Test, which purportedly measures behavior. Subseque
## EGIONAL EVALUATION OF MALIGNANT TU- R mors has clinical advantages in the recognition of their biological behavior. This is especially true if one compares the behavior of the tumor in two anatomically similar but functionally different organs, such as the hands and feet. This is the reason for