๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of the relative effectiveness of four methods of teaching manipulative activities

โœ Scribed by Clarence R. Calder


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1966
Tongue
English
Weight
243 KB
Volume
3
Category
Article
ISSN
0033-3085

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Confidence Intervals for Costโ€“Effectiven
โœ Daniel Polsky; Henry A. Glick; Richard Willke; Kevin Schulman ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 90 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We evaluated four methods for computing confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios developed from randomized controlled trials: the box method, the Taylor series method, the nonparametric bootstrap method and the Fieller theorem method. We performed a Monte Carlo experiment to compare these

An investigation into the relative manip
โœ John R. Chamberlin ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1985 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 758 KB

This paper contains a study about decision making in groups. The author analyzes the manipulability of four voting systems: Borda, Coombs, Hare, and plurality. The Hare voting system was found to be the least manipulable; the Borda, the most manipulable. The results of this study indicate that the l

The isolation of enteroviruses from bloo
โœ Sandra L. Prather; Ron Dagan; Jerri A. Jenista; Marilyn A. Menegus ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1984 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 422 KB

Blood from 28 children hospitalized with symptomatic enterovirus infections was processed by four different methods in an effort to define optimum conditions for detecting viremia. Enteroviremia was demonstrated in 11/28 children. Virus was isolated by method 1 (serum) in 7/11 children and by method

A comparison of four methods for assessi
โœ Jessica V. Stahl; Clara E. Hill ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 128 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

## Abstract The current study was designed to compare four possible methods of identifying natural helpers: a selfโ€report measure of natural helping ability, ratings by others of helping ability based on two 10โ€minute helping sessions, selfโ€report on measures assessing theoreticallyโ€derived constru