๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A comparison of dielectric theories in two dimensions

โœ Scribed by D.J. Isbister; B.C. Freasier

Publisher
Elsevier Science
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
386 KB
Volume
79
Category
Article
ISSN
0009-2614

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis

Comparison of numerical results for the dlelectnc constant IS pven for a fluid of dlpolar hard discs described by various approlunate theories Agreement of the slmuktlon data IS found with Berkowitz-Adelman theory speclabsed to two Cunenslons only for the hyh hquld density of pR * = 0 8 apparent agreement with the mean spherral approxuTlation III two dl-, mensrons IS found for pR* = 0 6

๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES

Social comparison on two dimensions
Social comparison on two dimensions
โœ Dr. A. Van Knippenberg; H. Wilke; N. K. De Vries ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1981 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1012 KB

## Abstract In this experiment social comparison on two task dimensions has been studied. The subjects received bogus feedback on their performance on two tests, one allegedly measuring creativity, the other alertness. By means of this feedback four relative position conditions were induced: scorin

Quantum Field Theory || In Two Dimension
Quantum Field Theory || In Two Dimensions
โœ Huang, Kerson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH ๐ŸŒ English โš– 668 KB

Quantum field theory is frequently approached from the perspective of particle physics. This book adopts a more general point of view and includes applications of condensed matter physics. Written by a highly respected writer and researcher, it first develops traditional concepts, including Feynman

A comparison of two theories of scatteri
A comparison of two theories of scattering of radiation in crops
โœ Margaret C. Anderson ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1969 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science โš– 380 KB

Two theories of the penetration and scattering of radiation in crops are compared, and shown to be formally identical when scattering is neglected. The theories predict differently the relative amounts of photosynthetically active and near infrared radiation under crops. Comparison of these predicti