## Abstract ## Purpose To compare the abilities of T2‐weighted (T2W) imaging using respiratory‐triggered fast spin‐echo (RT‐FSE), breathhold fast‐recovery FSE (BH‐FRFSE), and BH single‐shot FSE (BH‐SSFSE) sequences without an endorectal coil to detect rectosigmoid carcinomas. ## Materials and Met
A comparison of conventional spin-echo and fast spin-echo in the detection of multiple sclerosis
✍ Scribed by Wayne B. Patola; Bruce A. Coulter; Patricia M. Chipperfield; Sattam S. Lingawi
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 2001
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 389 KB
- Volume
- 13
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 1053-1807
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
Fast spin‐echo (FSE) pulse sequences enable T2‐weighted imaging in a fraction of the time required for T2‐weighted conventional spin‐echo (CSE) imaging. Due to concerns that the altered contrast characteristics of FSE may interfere with the visualization of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions, the sensitivity of T2‐weighted FSE sequences was compared to comparably weighted CSE sequences in the imaging of the brain in 100 patients with clinically suspected MS. The proton‐density FSE sequence revealed more MS lesions than its CSE counterpart, while the T2‐weighted CSE sequences were found to be more sensitive than the T2‐weighted FSE sequence. Contrast‐to‐noise ratios and signal‐to‐noise ratios compared favorably between sequences. Overall, there was little difference in the specificity between FSE and CSE in the diagnosis of MS. The higher sensitivity and the reduction in time attainable through the use of FSE warrants its replacement of CSE when imaging the brain in patients with clinically suspected MS. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2001;13:657–667. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
A computer simulation has been used to calculate the effects of J coupling on the amplitudes of echoes produced by CPMG sequences. The program computes the evolution of the density matrix for different pulse intervals and can predict the signals obtainable from spin systems of any size and complexit
## Abstract In 49 patients who had pelvic abnormalities, breath‐hold T2‐weighted fast‐recovery (FR)‐fast spin‐echo (FSE) (imaging time = 24 sec) and nonbreath‐hold FSE MR images (2 min 8 sec) were compared qualitatively (on a four‐point scale) and quantitatively (using signal‐to‐noise ratios (SNRs)