✦ LIBER ✦

A comparison between the WISC and WISC-R among educable mentally retarded students

✍ Scribed by Harry Hamm; Jimmy Wheeler; Steve McCallum; Maurice Herrin; Dorothy Hunter; Carol Catoe

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 324 KB
Volume: 13
Category: Article
ISSN: 0033-3085
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6807(197601)13:1<4::aid-pits2310130102>3.0.co;2-5

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A comparison of WISC and WISC-R results

A comparison of WISC and WISC-R results of urban educable mentally retarded students

✍ Ronald J. Gironda 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 387 KB 👁 2 views

Comparison of the PPVT-R and WISC-R with

Comparison of the PPVT-R and WISC-R with urban educable mentally retarded students

✍ David P. Prasse; Bruce A. Bracken 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB 👁 2 views

A longitudinal comparison of the wisc an

A longitudinal comparison of the wisc and wais with educable mentally retarded negroes

✍ Allen P. Webb 📂 Article 📅 1963 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 156 KB 👁 2 views

Comparison of the WISC-R and PPVT for a

Comparison of the WISC-R and PPVT for a group of mentally retarded students

✍ Hubert “Booney” Vance; Karen K. Prichard; Fred H. Wallbrown 📂 Article 📅 1978 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 238 KB 👁 1 views

A comparison between the WISC and WISC-R

A comparison between the WISC and WISC-R among a clinical referred population

✍ Bonnie McGonagle 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 318 KB 👁 1 views

A longitudinal comparison of WISC-III an

A longitudinal comparison of WISC-III and WISC-R scores of special education students

✍ Hubert Vance; Cleborne D. Maddux; Gerald B. Fuller; Abeer M. Awadh 📂 Article 📅 1998 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 400 KB 👁 1 views

This study investigated the performance of 166 special education students who had been administered the WISC-R and approximately 3 years later the WISC-111. The sample ranged in age from 6.0 to 16.6 years. The scores were analyzed using Pearson product moment correlation coefficients and t tests of