๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A Comparison Between Digital Examination and Per-rectal Ultrasound in the Evaluation of the Prostate

โœ Scribed by P. J. C. BROOMAN; W. B. PEELING; G. J. GRIFFITHS; E. ROBERTS; K. EVANS


Book ID
115192711
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1981
Tongue
English
Weight
456 KB
Volume
53
Category
Article
ISSN
1464-4096

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Prostate-specific antigen, digital recta
โœ Dr. Joseph R. Drago; Jeffrey P. York ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 331 KB

Over a 4% year period, 1,940 asymptomatic men were entered in a prostate cancer detection program consisting of digital rectal examination (DRE), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and transrectal prostate ultrasound (TRUS). Four hundred and sixteen biopsies were performed resulting in the diagnosis o

The role of digital rectal examination,
โœ Fred Lee; Peter J. Littrup ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1992 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 389 KB

In a study population, can digital rectal examination (DRE), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), and prostate specific antigen (PSA) (monoclonal) effectively detect the majority of clinically relevant cancer? If this is possible, the remaining patients could then be considered for chemopreventive protoco

Prostate-specific antigen coordinated wi
โœ W. H. Cooner ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› Springer-Verlag ๐ŸŒ English โš– 349 KB

In a aptient population, coordinated use of digital rectal examination and prostate-specific antigen can alert the physician as to the possible existence of prostate cancer. If both are used as first-line studies, abnormality of either can then direct the need for further study by transrectal ultras