A comparative study of normalized and unnormalized tuning errors in parameter adaptive control
✍ Scribed by A. S. Morse
- Publisher
- John Wiley and Sons
- Year
- 1992
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 548 KB
- Volume
- 6
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0890-6327
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
✦ Synopsis
Abstract
In the past year several advances in the development of adaptive control for non‐linear systems have made it clear that algorithms not using error normalization have several significant advantages over algorithms which do, in spite of their much greater complexity. In this paper simple examples are used to give a detailed account of the essential differences in structure between adaptive algorithms of the normalized and unnormalized types. It is explained why only the latter readily generalize to non‐linear process models with non‐global Lipschitz non‐linearities. It is shown that one of these algorithms is capable of stabilizing linear process models with different relative degrees.
📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES
Basis set truncation error BSTE , size extensivity Error SEE , zero point Ž . Ž . y vibrational energy ZPVE , and basis set superposition error BSSE of HeH weak van der Waals interaction energy were determined and compared at the self-consistent field Ž . Ž . Ž . SCF , many-body perturbation theory
## Abstract The glycosaminoglycans (GAG) of human cultured normal glial and malignant glioma cell lines were studied using ^35^S‐sulphate or ^3^H‐glucosamine as markers. ^35^S‐labelled GAG were assayed by precipitation with cetylpyridinium chloride; ^3^H‐labelled sulphated GAG and ^3^H‐labelled hya
Comparative studies were performed on the antioxidant enzyme activities and thiobarbituric acid reactive substance (TBARS) concentration in liver and red cells of two groups of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). The fish of the first group were cultured in freshwater and the others were adapted to