๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A combination of sister chromatid differential staining and giemsa banding

โœ Scribed by S. Pathak; A. D. Stock; A. Lusby


Book ID
112738358
Publisher
Springer
Year
1975
Tongue
English
Weight
721 KB
Volume
31
Category
Article
ISSN
1420-682X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Factors involved in differential giemsa-
โœ Keiko Goto; S. Maeda; Y. Kano; T. Sugiyama ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1978 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 964 KB

Microspectrophotometric evaluation of differentially stained sister chromatids made it possible to analyse precisely the factors involved in the Giemsa methods. The concentration of Hoechst 33258, pH of the mounting medium temperature during UV-exposure and the quality (wavelength)of UV-light influe

Combination of differential sister chrom
โœ Joe-jie Hoo; M. I. Parslow; Diana Chambers ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 238 KB

A method is presented for obtaining a combination of differential sister chromatid staining. G-banding and X-chromosome inactivation pattern. The result of this method enables a precise localization of the sister chromatid exchange points to particular bands of individual chromosomes.

Sister chromatid differential staining b
โœ Susumu Takayama; Shun-ichi Sakanishi ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1979 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 1002 KB

The direct staining of BrdU-substituted Chinese hamster chromosomes in a Na2HPO4-Giemsa solution without any pretreatments resulted in a B-dark type SCD istituted (TB) chromatids stained light. Detailed examinations of the staining process suggested that the Na2HPO4 solution acts to collapse chromos

Simple differential Giemsa staining of s
โœ Keiko Goto; T. Akematsu; H. Shimazu; T. Sugiyama ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1975 ๐Ÿ› Springer ๐ŸŒ English โš– 831 KB

The essential steps of the 33258 Hoechst-Giemsa method for differential chromatid staining consist of (1) 33258 Hoechst treatment, (2) exposure to light, and (3) Giemsa staining. The staining was shown to be a function of the concentration of 33258 Hoechst and the light exposure. The dye was success