๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

A Big-Five Personality Profile of the Adaptor and Innovator

โœ Scribed by NG AIK KWANG; DAPHNE RODRIGUES


Publisher
Creative Education Foundation
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
92 KB
Volume
36
Category
Article
ISSN
0022-0175

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study explored the relationship between two creative styles (adaptor and innovator) and the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness to experience). 164 teachers from 3 secondary and 2 primary schools in Singapore completed a selfโ€report questionnaire, which consisted of the Kirton Adaptionโ€Innovation Inventory and the NEOโ€Five Factor Inventory. It was found that adaptors were significantly more conscientious than innovators, while innovators were significantly more extraverted and open to experience than adaptors. No significant differences were found between adaptors and innovators in neuroticism and agreeableness. The study also revealed a meaningful pattern of relationships between the Big Five personality traits and the three facet scales of the KAI. Specifically, Sufficiency of Originality was negatively correlated with Openness to Experience and Extraversion; Rule Governance was positively correlated with conscientiousness but negatively correlated with openness to experience; Efficiency was positively correlated with conscientiousness. The overall findings supported the fundamental contention that different creative styles were due to different combinations of personality traits, with adaptors being more conscientious, while innovators being more extraverted and open to experience. These personalityโ€based differences in creative styles between adaptors and innovators had resulted in much social conflict between them. One way of resolving it is to make known the nature and value of different creative styles to these two different types of creators.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


The big five factors of personality and
โœ Jamie A. Dyce ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 67 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 3 views

Articles examining the relationship between the Big Five factors of personality and personality disorders (PDs) are reviewed. A survey of these studies indicates that there is some agreement regarding the relationship between the Big Five and PDs. However, the level of agreement varies and may be a

A Comparison of Big-Five structures of p
โœ WILLEM K. B. HOFSTEE; HENK A. L. KIERS; BOELE DE RAAD; LEWIS R. GOLDBERG; FRITZ ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1997 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 198 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

We compare Big-Five factor structures found in Dutch, American English, and German, and present a joint structure. The data consist of self-and peer ratings of 600 subjects with 551 Dutch trait-descriptive adjectives, 636 subjects with 540 English adjectives, and 802 subjects with 430 German adjecti

Extending Big-Five theory into childhood
โœ David J. Ehrler; J. Gary Evans; Ron L. McGhee ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1999 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 29 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

An investigation was conducted to link Big-Five personality traits with behavior problems identified in childhood. Eighty-six children ranging in age from 9 to 13 were rated by their respective classroom teacher using an experimental ratings instrument developed to measure Big-Five personality const

Evidence for the Big Five in analyses of
โœ Gerard Saucier; Lewis R. Goldberg ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1996 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 921 KB

Studies of the natural language are a prime source of the Big-Five model, yet the factor analysis of a large, representative, and non-clustered set of English-language personality adjectives in a large sample has not yet been published. In order to test the hypothesis that fmding the Big Five depend

The Big Five personality factors as a mo
โœ Ivan Mervielde; Filip De Fruyt ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2000 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 150 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 2 views

The validity and usefulness of the ยฎve-factor theory of personality as a model for children's peer nominations is assessed. Eighty-nine groups of ten school children, attending the same class, aged 9 to 12 years, nominated the pupil that was the most or the least typical example for 25 bipolar trait