𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Personality and intimate partner aggression in dating relationships: the role of the “Big Five”

✍ Scribed by Denise A. Hines; Kimberly J. Saudino


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
2008
Tongue
English
Weight
151 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0096-140X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


The big five factors of personality and
✍ Jamie A. Dyce 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 67 KB 👁 1 views

Articles examining the relationship between the Big Five factors of personality and personality disorders (PDs) are reviewed. A survey of these studies indicates that there is some agreement regarding the relationship between the Big Five and PDs. However, the level of agreement varies and may be a

Aggressive acts and assaults in intimate
✍ Felicity A. Goodyear-Smith; Tannis M. Laidlaw 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 182 KB 👁 2 views

Far more people in relationships are subjected to violent acts than those who receive injuries. The degree of damage sustained may not re¯ect the perpetrator's intent to deliberately harm a partner. Data documenting aggressive acts determines the population at risk and their prevention and early tre

Extending Big-Five theory into childhood
✍ David J. Ehrler; J. Gary Evans; Ron L. McGhee 📂 Article 📅 1999 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 29 KB 👁 1 views

An investigation was conducted to link Big-Five personality traits with behavior problems identified in childhood. Eighty-six children ranging in age from 9 to 13 were rated by their respective classroom teacher using an experimental ratings instrument developed to measure Big-Five personality const

Relational aggression and victimization
✍ Thomas M. Kelley; Richard A. Robertson 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 137 KB 👁 2 views

## Abstract This article presents two studies that are the first to examine relational aggression and relational victimization in gay male peer relationships. A qualitative pilot study provides a strong rationale for a subsequent empirical investigation of 100 young adult, self‐identified gay males