✦ LIBER ✦

2D or not 2D? That is the question

✍ Scribed by J.P. Mossa

Book ID: 114269124
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2000
Tongue: English
Weight: 30 KB
Volume: 117
Category: Article
ISSN: 1097-6752
DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70206-x

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

D3 or not D3 … that is not the question

✍ Kevin K Roggin; Mitchell C Posner 📂 Article 📅 2006 🏛 The Lancet 🌐 English ⚖ 384 KB

4D, or not 4D: that is the question

✍ Stuart Campbell 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 227 KB

2B or 2B and 2D?– That is the question

✍ David J. A. Wyllie 📂 Article 📅 2008 🏛 Cambridge University Press 🌐 English ⚖ 193 KB

D2 or not D2? The gastrectomy question

✍ Wyn G. Lewis; Paul Edwards; Jonathan D. Barry; Saboor Khan; Daljit Dhariwal; Ili 📂 Article 📅 2002 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 79 KB

3D or Not 3D? Is that a Question?

✍ Leonard Steinbach 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Rowman & Littlefield Publishing Group 🌐 English ⚖ 490 KB

2D or not 2D

✍ Stephen J Fey; Peter Mose Larsen 📂 Article 📅 2001 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 186 KB

2D gel electrophoresis is the technology that everyone loves to hate-it requires manual dexterity and precision to reproduce precisely and is thus not well-suited as a high-throughput technology. Although almost everyone would like to replace it, the resolution and sensitivity it offers are exquisit