𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

β-carotene supplementation for patients with low baseline levels and decreased risks of total and prostate carcinoma

✍ Scribed by Nancy R. Cook; Meir J. Stampfer; Jing Ma; JoAnn E. Manson; Frank M. Sacks; Julie E. Buring; Charles H. Hennekens


Book ID
101231036
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
107 KB
Volume
86
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


BACKGROUND.

The Physicians' Health Study was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using a 2 ϫ 2 factorial design including supplementation with ␤-carotene (50 mg every other day) in the primary prevention of cancer among 22,071 U.S. male physicians ages 40 -84 years at randomization. Before randomization, the authors collected baseline blood specimens to determine whether any benefit was greater among or confined to those with low baseline levels of ␤-carotene.

METHODS.

Baseline blood samples were collected from 14,916 participants. These samples were assayed, according to a nested case-control design, from 1439 men subsequently diagnosed with cancer over 12 years of follow-up (631 with prostate carcinoma) and 2204 controls matched by age and smoking habits.

RESULTS.

Men in the lowest quartile for plasma ␤-carotene at baseline had a marginally significant (P ϭ 0.07) increased risk of cancer compared with those in the highest quartile (relative risk [RR] ϭ 1.30, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98 -1.74). Men in the lowest quartile assigned at random to ␤-carotene supplementation had a possible but nonsignificant decrease in overall cancer risk (RR ϭ 0.83, 95% CI, 0.63-1.09) compared with those assigned to placebo. This was primarily due to a significant reduction in the risk of prostate carcinoma (RR ϭ 0.68, 95% CI, 0.46 -0.99) in this group. After the first 2 years of follow-up were excluded, the results were virtually unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS.

These prespecified subgroup analyses appeared to support the idea that ␤-carotene supplementation may reduce risk of prostate carcinoma among those with low baseline levels. Further follow-up of this population will help determine whether these findings are valid.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


A comparison of external beam radiation
✍ Alvaro A. Martinez; Jose A. Gonzalez; Andrew K. Chung; Larry L. Kestin; Mamtha B 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 84 KB 👁 2 views

## Background: The authors retrospectively reviewed their institution's long term experience treating a group of comparably staged low risk prostate carcinoma patients with either radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy (rt) to determine whether the method of treatment resulted in