𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

α1-adrenergic, D1, and D2 receptors interactions in the prefrontal cortex: Implications for the modality of action of different types of neuroleptics

✍ Scribed by Yves Gioanni; Anne-Marie Thierry; Jacques Glowinski; Jean-Pol Tassin


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1998
Tongue
English
Weight
149 KB
Volume
30
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-4476

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


The activation of rat mesocortical dopaminergic (DA) neurons evoked by the electrical stimulation of the ventral tegmental area (VTA) induces a marked inhibition of the spontaneous activity of prefrontocortical cells. In the present study, it was first shown that systemic administration of either clozapine (a mixed antagonist of D 1 , D 2 , and ␣ 1 -adrenergic receptors) (3-5 mg/kg, i.v.), prazosin (an ␣ 1 -adrenergic antagonist) (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), or sulpiride (a D 2 antagonist) (30 mg/kg, i.v.), but not SCH 23390 (a D 1 antagonist) (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), reversed this cortical inhibition. Second, it was found that following the systemic administration of prazosin, the VTA-induced cortical inhibition reappeared when either SCH 23390 or sulpiride was applied by iontophoresis into the prefrontal cortex. Third, it was seen that, whereas haloperidol (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.), a D 2 antagonist which also blocks ␣ 1 -adrenergic receptors, failed to reverse the VTA-induced inhibition, the systemic administration of haloperidol plus SCH 23390 (0.2 mg/kg, i.v.) blocked this inhibition. Finally, it was verified that the cortical inhibitions obtained following treatments with either ''prazosin plus sulpiride'' or ''prazosin plus SCH 23390'' were blocked by a superimposed administration of either SCH 23390 or sulpiride, respectively. These data indicate that complex interactions between cortical D 2 , D 1 , and ␣ 1 -adrenergic receptors are involved in the regulation of the activity of prefrontocortical cells innervated by the VTA neurons. They confirm that the physiological stimulation of cortical ␣ 1 -adrenergic receptors hampers the functional activity of cortical D 1 receptors and suggest that the stimulations of cortical D 1 and D 2 receptors exert mutual inhibition on each other's transmission.


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Requirement for the endocannabinoid syst
✍ Michelle Zenko; Yongyong Zhu; Eliyahu Dremencov; Wei Ren; Lin Xu; Xia Zhang 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 787 KB

## Abstract The dopamine receptor family consists of D1–D5 receptors (D1R–D5R), and we explored the contributions of each dopamine receptor subtype in the piriform cortex (PirC) to social interaction impairment (SII). Rats received behavioral tests or electrophysiological recording of PirC neuronal

Agonist and antagonist actions of yohimb
✍ Mark J. Millan; Adrian Newman-Tancredi; Valérie Audinot; Didier Cussac; François 📂 Article 📅 2000 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 340 KB 👁 1 views

Herein, we evaluate the interaction of the ␣ 2 -AR antagonist, yohimbine, as compared to fluparoxan, at multiple monoaminergic receptors and examine their roles in the modulation of adrenergic, dopaminergic and serotonergic transmission in freelymoving rats. Yohimbine displays marked affinity at hum

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray an
✍ Carola Bruna; Gloria Arriagada; Jane B. Lian; Gary S. Stein; Marta Bunster; Jose 📂 Article 📅 2007 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 133 KB

## Abstract The Runx2 transcription factor is a key regulator of osteoblast differentiation. In response to 1α,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3, Runx2 may interact with the 1α,25 dihydroxy vitamin D3 receptor (VDR) in the promoter of target genes, producing a synergic activation of their transcription. Prev