𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

X-ray observations of stellar coronae and flares: The “SOLAR-Aconnection”

✍ Scribed by Robert A. Stern


Publisher
Springer
Year
1987
Tongue
English
Weight
198 KB
Volume
113
Category
Article
ISSN
0038-0938

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


It is now more than ten years since the first x-ray emitting stellar corona was discovered (Catura, Acton, and Johnson 1975). Since then, rapid progress has been made in cataloging the incidence and range of stellar x-ray emission, most notably with the Einstein Observatory (see, eg., reviews by Stern 1983Stern , 1984;; Rosner, Golub, and Valana 1985, Haisch 1986 ). For strong coronal sources, such as RS CVn systems, non-dispersive, low resolution spectroscopic observations have been made with the Imaging Proportional Counter (Majer et al., 1986 ) and also at higher spectral resolution (dE/E -~ 10 -20%) with the Solid State Spectrometer (SSS) on Einstein. Typical results of such observations are that highly active stellar coronas (L, ,,~ 1031 erg s -1) are not well modeled by isothermal plasma emission, requiring at least two components with different temperatures, and in some cases, different emission measures ( Swank et al. 1981, Mewe et EL1. 1982 ). For active stars in the Hyades cluster observed with the IPC, single-component, distributed emission measure loop models with flare-like maximum loop temperatures (Tma, "~ 1-2 x 107 K ) are equally viable interpretations of the data (Stern, Antiochos, and Harnden 1986 ). Higher resolution EXOSAT transmission grating spectroscopy has indicated the need for a multi-thermal plasma in active stellar coronae ( Schrijver and Mewe 1986). More recently, a reanalysis of the EXOSAT spectra has suggested that twocomponent distributed emission measure loop models may accurately model the coronae of Capella and Sigma Corona Borealis (Mewe et al. 1986).

The most active stellar coronae also produce flares with 100 -1000 times the emission measure and x-ray peak luminosities of the largest solar flares (White, Sanford, and Weiler 1978, Stern, Underwood, and Antiochos 1983, Montmerle et al 1983, White et al. 1986 ; and reviews by Haisch 1983, Stern 1984). Simple models of such flares suggest that, given their l0 -50 x 106 K maximum temperatures, they are scaled up solar flares involving a several orders of magnitude increase in flare plasma volume. The spatial distribution of such flare plasma -i.e. many small flaring loops over a large area, or very few, stellar-sized loops -is quite uncertain. Attempts have been made to determine the flare size scale using the decay phase of soft x-ray stellar flares, which usually begins as a simple exponential. This has been interpreted as a time scale for loop plasma cooling, either via radiation, conduction, or both ( e.g, Moore et al. 1980, Stern, Antiochos, and Underwood 1983, Haisch 1983, White et al.1986 ).


📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES


Soft X-ray and microwave observations of
✍ H. S. Hudson; K. Ohki 📂 Article 📅 1972 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 696 KB

Hot regions in solar flares produce X-radiation and microwaves by thermal processes. Recent X-ray data make it possible to specify the temperature and emission measure of the soft X-ray source, by using, for instance, a combination of the 1-8 A (peak response at about 2 keV) and the 0.5-3 ]k (peak r

Modelling a solar flare from X-ray, UV,
✍ F. Chiuderi Drago; B. C. Monsignori Fossi 📂 Article 📅 1991 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 936 KB

A slowly evolving, flaring loop was observed by the UVSP, XRP, and HXIS instruments onboard SMM on June 10, 1980. Simultaneous radio observations from Toyokawa (Japan) are also available. The SMM instruments have an angular resolution ranging from 3 to 30 arc sec by which the loop structure may be d