๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Workshop II. Guidelines for breast cancer screening

โœ Scribed by Sam Shapiro; Charles R. Smart; Mary E. Costanza; Donald E. Henson; Arthur I. Holleb; Robert V. P. Hutter; Barry Kramer; Harvey D. Kushner; Robert McLelland; Myron Moskowitz; Gerald P. Murphy; Steven H. Woolf; Marie D. Zinninger


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1992
Tongue
English
Weight
171 KB
Volume
69
Category
Article
ISSN
0008-543X

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


The issue addressed by the Guidelines Workshop centered on the questions, "Should the American Cancer Society Guidelines for breast cancer screening remain unchanged? If not, how should they be changed?" Rationale pro and con is needed. After a general discussion on procedure and amplifying statements related to some of the material covered at the previous session, the workshop group addressed in sequence the following topics covered by the current American Cancer Society Guidelines: (1) baseline mammography at 35 through 39 years of age; (2) screening at 40 through 49 years of age; (3) upper age limit for screening; (4) periodicity of screening; ( 5 ) breast self-examination (BSE); and (6) clinical breast examination (CBE) (Table 1).

Strong dffering points of view were advanced on most of these topics but, in the end, recommendations were adopted unanimously on all of the issues. This workshop was influenced in many instances by the unavailability of evidence requiring a change.

Note that, on several issues, there was agreement on amplifying statements to inform the American Cancer Society and others more fully the intent behind the recommendations and the need for additional studies. The point was made repeatedly that a more detailed analysis of the evidence affecting the guidelines should be undertaken by the American Cancer Society National Advisory Committee on Cancer Prevention and Detection and that a report be prepared explaining the basis for the guidelines (results of studies, expert opinion).


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Mammography screening for breast cancer
โœ Daniel B. Kopans ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1993 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ English โš– 418 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views
Efficacy of breast-cancer screening for
โœ Mei-Shu Lai; Ming-Fang Yen; Hsu-Sung Kuo; Shin-Lan Koong; Tony Hsiu-Hsi Chen; St ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1998 ๐Ÿ› John Wiley and Sons ๐ŸŒ French โš– 79 KB ๐Ÿ‘ 1 views

Although the efficacy of mass screening for breast cancer has been established in Western countries, this strategy may be too costly for other countries with low incidence rates of breast cancer. We propose an alternative approach to screen female relatives of breast-cancer-index cases from hospital