Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient
β Scribed by Robert P Heaney; Michael F Holick
- Publisher
- American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
- Year
- 2011
- Tongue
- English
- Weight
- 53 KB
- Volume
- 26
- Category
- Article
- ISSN
- 0884-0431
- DOI
- 10.1002/jbmr.328
No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.
β¦ Synopsis
Abstract
The IOM recommendations for vitamin D fail in a major way on logic, on science, and on effective public health guidance. Moreover, by failing to use a physiological referent, the IOM approach constitutes precisely the wrong model for development of nutritional policy. Β© 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
π SIMILAR VOLUMES
1,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (1,25) and 24,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (24,25) mediate their effects on chondrocytes through the classic vitamin D receptor (VDR) as well as through rapid membrane-mediated mechanisms, which result in both nongenomic and genomic effects. In intact cells, it is difficult to distinguish between g
Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms have been reported to account for most of the well established genetic influence on bone mineral density (BMD). However, discordant studies have been published and it is still not clear whether VDR genotypes influence bone mass accretion and/or postmenopau