𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

Why the IOM recommendations for vitamin D are deficient

✍ Scribed by Robert P Heaney; Michael F Holick


Publisher
American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Year
2011
Tongue
English
Weight
53 KB
Volume
26
Category
Article
ISSN
0884-0431

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Abstract

The IOM recommendations for vitamin D fail in a major way on logic, on science, and on effective public health guidance. Moreover, by failing to use a physiological referent, the IOM approach constitutes precisely the wrong model for development of nutritional policy. Β© 2011 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


A-ring analogues of 1,25-(OH)2D3 with lo
✍ Daniel M. Greising; Zvi Schwartz; Gary H. Posner; Victor L. Sylvia; David D. Dea πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 283 KB πŸ‘ 1 views

1,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (1,25) and 24,25-(OH) 2 D 3 (24,25) mediate their effects on chondrocytes through the classic vitamin D receptor (VDR) as well as through rapid membrane-mediated mechanisms, which result in both nongenomic and genomic effects. In intact cells, it is difficult to distinguish between g

Vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms ar
✍ Patrick Garnero; Olivier Borel; Elisabeth Sornay-Rendu; Monique E. Arlot; Pierre πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2009 πŸ› American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 🌐 English βš– 662 KB

Vitamin D receptor (VDR) gene polymorphisms have been reported to account for most of the well established genetic influence on bone mineral density (BMD). However, discordant studies have been published and it is still not clear whether VDR genotypes influence bone mass accretion and/or postmenopau