Giemsa techniques have refused to reveal G-banding patterns in plant chromosomes. Whatever has been differentially stained so far in plant chromosomes by various techniques represents constitutive heterochromatin (redefined in this paper). Patterns of this type must not be confused with the G-banding patterns of higher vertebrates which reveal an additional chromosome segmentation beyond that due to constitutive heterochromatin. The absence of G-bands in plants is explained as follows: 1) Plant chromosomes in metaphase contain much more DNA than G-banding vertebrate chromosomes of comparable length. At such a high degree of contraction vertebrate chromosomes too would not show G-bands, simply for optical reasons. 2) The striking correspondence of pachytene chromomeres and mitotic G-bands in higher vertebrates suggests that pachytene chromomeres are G-band equivalents, and that this may also be the case in plants. G-banded vertebrate chromosomes are on the average only 2.3 times shorter in mitosis than in pachytene; the chromomeric pattern therefore still can be shown. In contrast, plant chromosomes are approximately 10 times shorter at mitotic metaphase; their pachytene-like arrangement of chromomeres is therefore no longer demonstrable.