✦ LIBER ✦

Why multiple choice language tests are sometimes not

✍ Scribed by Pickering, M.J.

Book ID: 122545155
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1976
Tongue: English
Weight: 533 KB
Volume: 4
Category: Article
ISSN: 0346-251X
DOI: 10.1016/0346-251X(76)90037-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Why multiple choice language tests still

Why multiple choice language tests still are

✍ Hirvonen, P.A. 📂 Article 📅 1977 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 299 KB

Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girl

Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girls?

✍ Jan Hellekant 📂 Article 📅 1994 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 283 KB

Why Is Performance on Multiple-Choice Te

Why Is Performance on Multiple-Choice Tests and Constructed-Response Tests Not More Closely Related? Theory and an Empirical Test

✍ William L. Kuechler; Mark G. Simkin 📂 Article 📅 2010 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 221 KB

Why interactive computer systems are som

Why interactive computer systems are sometimes not used by people who might benefit from them

✍ Raymond S. Nickerson 📂 Article 📅 1981 🏛 Elsevier Science ⚖ 970 KB

Several reasons are considered why some people who might benefit from using computer systems do not use them. The discussion is organized around examples of several classes of complaints that abstainers and dissatisfied users have been known to make regarding various aspects of the design and operat

Language of instruction in Tanzania: Why

Language of instruction in Tanzania: Why are research findings not heeded?

✍ Martha A. S. Qorro 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Springer Netherlands 🌐 English ⚖ 574 KB

Why humans are (sometimes) less rational

Why humans are (sometimes) less rational than other animals: Cognitive complexity and the axioms of rational choice

✍ Stanovich, Keith E. 📂 Article 📅 2013 🏛 Taylor and Francis Group 🌐 English ⚖ 205 KB