𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium

✦ LIBER ✦

Why is the bishops' letter on the U.S. economy so unconvincing?

✍ Scribed by William S. Reece

Publisher: Springer
Year: 1989
Tongue: English
Weight: 720 KB
Volume: 8
Category: Article
ISSN: 0167-4544
DOI: 10.1007/bf00382931

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

The Bishops’ letter on the economy and p

The Bishops’ letter on the economy and public policy

✍ Joseph W. Ford 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer ⚖ 900 KB

Ethical principles of Catholic social te

Ethical principles of Catholic social teaching behind the United States bishops' letter on the economy

✍ Charles E. Curran 📂 Article 📅 1988 🏛 Springer 🌐 English ⚖ 479 KB

Why is it so difficult to accept Darwin'

Why is it so difficult to accept Darwin's theory of evolution? : On the popular fallacy that evolution has a predetermined direction, and the development of a responsible worldview based on free will

✍ Jacques Dubochet 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 71 KB 👁 1 views

Preambles and resolutions relating to re

Preambles and resolutions relating to revision of U. S. copyright and patent laws**This draft was prepared by Dr. F. E. Stewart, chairman of the Committee on Patents and Trade-marks, A. Ph A., for Dr. S. Solis Cohen, Chairman of the Committee on Scope, U. S. P. IX. It was also submitted in the report of the Committee on Patents and Trade Marks, of the Merchants’ and Manufacturers’ Association of Philadelphia, composed of Ernest T. Trigg (President Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce), Charles A. Wagner and Dr. F. E. Stewart, and approved. The matter in italics is suggested for revising the present U. S. Copyright and Patent Laws, and the subject is submitted for study by the members of the American Pharmaceutical Association, preparatory to its discussion at the next annual convention. The Committee received instructions at the last meeting to proceed with the revision, and the Chairman is desirous that the subject be carefully considered from every viewpoint.The Committee believes that all ambiguity now existing in the law should be removed in the revision. Provision should also be made in the law so that the inventor of a new process can secure a royalty from the original patentee. Attention is again directed that matter in italics embody the suggestions of the Committee for additions to the copyright, patent and trademark laws.—Editor.

📂 Article 📅 1917 🏛 Elsevier ⚖ 998 KB