✦ LIBER ✦

Who gets caught?: Statistical discrimination in law enforcement

✍ Scribed by Ambrose Leung; Frances Woolley; Richard E. Tremblay; Frank Vitaro

Book ID: 116886367
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 2005
Tongue: English
Weight: 140 KB
Volume: 34
Category: Article
ISSN: 1053-5357
DOI: 10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.016

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

Do expert patients get better treatment

Do expert patients get better treatment than others? Agency discrimination and statistical discrimination in obstetrics

✍ Jostein Grytten; Irene Skau; Rune Sørensen 📂 Article 📅 2011 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 521 KB

The level of random background glass rec

The level of random background glass recovered from fleece jackets of individuals who worked in Law enforcement or related professions

✍ Niamh Nic Daéid; Donna McColl; Jane Ballany 📂 Article 📅 2009 🏛 Elsevier Science 🌐 English ⚖ 251 KB

Who, what, and when: A descriptive exami

Who, what, and when: A descriptive examination of crowd formation, crowd behavior, and participation with law enforcement at homicide scenes in one city

✍ Robyn Diehl Lacks; Jill A. Gordon; Colleen Mclaughlin Mccue 📂 Article 📅 2005 🏛 Springer-Verlag 🌐 English ⚖ 1006 KB

Author's Reply: Survival analysis of ran

Author's Reply: Survival analysis of randomized clinical trials adjusted for patients who switch treatments by M. G. Law and J. M. Kaldor, Statistics in Medicine, 15, 2069–2076 (1996)

✍ Matthew G. Law; John M. Kaldor 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 123 KB 👁 2 views

Letter to the Editor: Survival analysis

Letter to the Editor: Survival analysis of randomized clinical trials adjusted for patients who switch treatments by M. G. Law and J. M. Kaldor, Statistics in Medicine, 15, 2069–2076 (1996)

✍ I. R. White 📂 Article 📅 1997 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 125 KB 👁 2 views

Law and Kaldor address the important question of clinical trials with survival outcomes in which subjects may change in a non-randomized manner from one randomized treatment to the other during the course of follow-up. These changes make the treatment experience of the two randomized groups more sim