๐”– Bobbio Scriptorium
โœฆ   LIBER   โœฆ

Which balloon embolectomy catheter?

โœ Scribed by P. G. Niblett; J. M. Fleischl; Mr W. B. Campbell


Book ID
101744158
Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1990
Tongue
English
Weight
352 KB
Volume
77
Category
Article
ISSN
0007-1323

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

โœฆ Synopsis


This study compared seven makes of balloon embolectomy catheter currently available, testing the most commonly used 4 Fr catheters. The volume offluid and infration pressure required to burst balloons of each type were measured. All balloons showed a similar shape of inflation curve, but compliance varied considerably, and the pressure required to burst different balloon types varied from 1060 to 1920 cmH,O. Two balloon types consistently fragmented when they burst in free space. On a specially designed mechanical rig balloon catheters were pulled through a 6 m m tube containing a fixed stenosis, with continuous measurement of traction force and intraballoon pressure. Traction force varied from 34 to 129 g (median 40 9) during passage along the tube, and from 254 to 463g (median 350g) during passage through the stenosis. The shear force imparted by the balloon to the tube wall was also calculated. This study provides comparative data which may help to guide surgeons in their choice of balloon embolectomy catheter.


๐Ÿ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


Perfusion balloon catheter
โœ Richard S. Stack; Peter J. Quigley; Gary Collins; Harry R. Phillips III ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 1988 ๐Ÿ› Elsevier Science ๐ŸŒ English โš– 649 KB
Balloon catheter sinusotomy
โœ Dale H. Rice ๐Ÿ“‚ Article ๐Ÿ“… 2008 ๐Ÿ› SAGE Publications ๐ŸŒ English โš– 33 KB