✦ LIBER ✦

When to combine group judgments and when not to in the analytic hierarchy process: A new method

✍ Scribed by I. Basak

Publisher: Elsevier Science
Year: 1988
Tongue: English
Weight: 669 KB
Volume: 10
Category: Article
ISSN: 0895-7177
DOI: 10.1016/0895-7177(88)90028-3

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis

In paired comparisons,

the individuals in a number of groups giving their judgments are examined for agreement among themselves. Statistical methods are applied to see whether these groups are significantly different in giving their judgments or not. When individual judgments are homogeneous, a single matrix is obtained for all of them to obtain a common rank order and weights. Otherwise, separate matrices are estimated for significantly different group judgments.

Two numerical examples are given to explain the methodologies developed in the paper.

📜 SIMILAR VOLUMES

A note on a method to ensure rank-order

A note on a method to ensure rank-order consistency in the analytic hierarchy process

✍ J.S. Finan; W.J. Hurley 📂 Article 📅 1996 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 273 KB

Determination of the maximum tolerated d

Determination of the maximum tolerated dose of idarubicin when used in a combination chemotherapy program of reinduction of childhood ALL at first marrow relapse and a preliminary assessment of toxicity compared to that of daunorubicin: A report from the childrens cancer study group

✍ Feig, Stephen A. ;Krailo, Mark D. ;Harris, Richard E. ;Baum, Edward ;Holcenberg, 📂 Article 📅 1992 🏛 John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English ⚖ 566 KB

## Abstract An escalating‐dose trial of idarubicin, used weekly for 3 doses in combination with vincristine, prednisone, and L‐asparaginase (VPLI), to reinduce remission of childhood ALL at first bone marrow relapse was conducted by the Childrens Cancer Study Group (CCSG). The maximum tolerated dos