𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

What, with what, and to whom: the limits of psychiatry

✍ Scribed by Eric Ratcliff


Publisher
Informa plc
Year
2002
Tongue
English
Weight
136 KB
Volume
10
Category
Article
ISSN
1039-8562

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Objective: To identify some general principles for use in deciding what is psychiatry and what is not.

Method: An overview of matters referred to the Clinical Practice Advisory Committee of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists.

Results: Three domains of psychiatric practice are identified: competence, ethics and performance. A number of quasi-paradoxical dichotomies in the nature of psychiatry have emerged: doctor-specialist, scientist-clinician, humane-commercial. These are not exhaustive.

Conclusion: Some useful generalisations can be made about the limits of acceptable psychiatric practice but, within these, there is a need for further investigation of the realities of practice. A pilot study of clinicians' opinions is proposed.


πŸ“œ SIMILAR VOLUMES


What works for whom: Tailoring psychothe
✍ John C. Norcross; Bruce E. Wampold πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2010 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 90 KB

## Abstract This article introduces the issue of the __Journal of Clinical Psychology: In Session__ devoted to evidence‐based means of adapting psychotherapy to the patient's (transdiagnostic) characteristics. Practitioners have long realized that treatment should be tailored to the individuality o

Credit from whom and for what? The diver
✍ Isabelle GuΓ©rin; Marc Roesch; Govidan Venkatasubramanian; Bert D'Espallier πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 2011 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 137 KB

## Abstract This article aimed to deepen understandings of poor household borrowing practices by drawing on a case study from rural Southern India. It combines descriptive statistics and qualitative analysis to show that households juggle with a wide range of borrowing sources and that each serves

What to do about softwood? A review of r
✍ Paul A. Demers; Kay Teschke; Susan M. Kennedy πŸ“‚ Article πŸ“… 1997 πŸ› John Wiley and Sons 🌐 English βš– 85 KB

## Wood dust has been classified as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer with a footnote that the evaluation was based on a marked excess of sino-nasal cancer among workers exposed primarily to hardwood dusts. Because the epidemiologic data on the carcinogenic effec