𝔖 Bobbio Scriptorium
✦   LIBER   ✦

What determines the van der Waals coefficient β in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?

✍ Scribed by Wei Wang; Jian Wang; Peter A. Kollman


Publisher
John Wiley and Sons
Year
1999
Tongue
English
Weight
111 KB
Volume
34
Category
Article
ISSN
0887-3585

No coin nor oath required. For personal study only.

✦ Synopsis


Recently a semiempirical method has been proposed by A ˚qvist et al. to calculate absolute and relative binding free energies. In this method, the absolute binding free energy of a ligand is estimated as

, where V bound el and V bound vdw are the electrostatic and van der Waals interaction energies between the ligand and the solvated protein from an molecular dynamics (MD) trajectory with ligand bound to protein and V free el and V free vdw are the electrostatic and van der Waals interaction energies between the ligand and the water from an MD trajectory with the ligand in water. A set of values, ␣ ‫؍‬ 0.5 and ␤ ‫؍‬ 0.16, was found to give results in good agreement with experimental data. Later, however, different optimal values of ␤ were found in studies of compounds binding to P450cam 4 and avidin. 5 The present work investigates how the optimal value of ␤ depends on the nature of binding sites for different proteinligand interactions. By examining seven ligands interacting with five proteins, we have discovered a linear correlation between the value of ␤ and the weighted non-polar desolvation ratio (WNDR), with a correlation coefficient of 0.96. We have also examined the ability of this correlation to predict optimal values of ␤ for different ligands binding to a single protein. We studied twelve neutral compounds bound to avidin. In this case, the WNDR approach gave a better estimate of the absolute binding free energies than results obtained using the fixed value of ␤ found for biotin-avidin. In terms of reproducing the relative binding free energy to biotin, the fixed-␤ value gave better results for compounds similar to biotin, but for compounds less similar to biotin, the WNDR approach led to better relative binding free energies. Proteins 1999;34:395-402.